Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Try Pro Features for Free
Start your 7 day free trial. Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties.
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Jeff Goldberg

Jeff Goldberg has started 1 posts and replied 3 times.

Thanks all.  I consulted with an attorney as well and he confirmed as long as the contract does not specifically mention a requirement for mutual release then none is required.  My agent has said all along that we need to have it signed but not being an attorney, I think she was ultimately attempting to protect herself from liability.

All that said, the buyer ended up signing it today anyway. It just means that none of us no longer have any contractual obligation to one another.  That said, it would have been interesting had he not signed it -- academically.

Thanks again all!

J

Thanks @Curt Davis, that was my take as well.  My agent is reluctant to continue with the backup buyer but we'll see what happens.

Have you been in a similar situation as well?

Thanks again,

Jeff

Hi BPers!

I live in OHIO I have a tough situation. I was in contract to sell my home to a buyer (#1).

During the contract period I was offered (from a previous potential buyer #2) much more to purchase my home.  Obviously I was already in contract and was going to honor that. However, the buyer (#1, with whom I was in contract) failed to provide proof of financing during the financing period.  Their agent was new and had never completed a deal before.  In fact, they only had a 15 day period from contract start to provide proof of funds.  Since they missed the clearly outlined period, my agent sent them notice that they had missed that deadline and that the contract was now invalid.  The buyers agent was scrambling and realized (after we told them) that the milestone had been missed.

In any case, my agent then sent the buyer (#1) a mutual release agreement which (from my understanding) basically says that no one has any obligations to anyone.  Now, of course, the buyer (#1) is refusing to sign it.  At this point, my agent tells me that we can't continue with the second buyer (#2) since we don't have a signed Mutual Release agreement.  The 'backup' buyer (#2) still has interest and knows that we are waiting for the first buyer (#1) to sign the agreement.

I can't imagine that I have to wait around for the #1 buyer to sign the agreement.  I'm wondering if I can just continue with buyer #2 EVEN if I don't get the signed Mutual Release agreement from buyer #1. 

Has anyone been in this position before and have any suggestions?  I AM going to be taking this up with an attorney, but since it's the weekend, I'd just like to have a take on this by someone that's been through this before.

Thanks

Jeff