Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Try Pro Features for Free
Start your 7 day free trial. Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties.
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Jessica Thomas

Jessica Thomas has started 1 posts and replied 7 times.

Another thing is it's a total sellers market here and I'm seeing some houses where FHA is not even listed. I know my realtor can call and see what their issue is and perhaps see if they would entertain fha but I feel like I would appear like an unstable option with am Fha despite the high income.

Originally posted by @Chris Mason:
Originally posted by @Jessica Thomas:

I'm looking into purchasing a single family home in the mid 300s range. Income is more than fine, debt to income is 5%, only issue is credit is only 650. All the lenders I've talked to keep pushing FHA but I'm afraid I'll be stuck with MIP and won't be able to refinance at a decent rate later. Thoughts?

I ran the scenario both ways, and FHA is going to run you like $400/mo cheaper than conventional on a $400k purchase price (just noticed the "mid 300s" range part, but that won't really change anything). FHA mortgage insurance will be less per month and the interest rate will be ballpark a full 1% lower. There are certain things priced so poorly that loan officers don't even want to quote it, and this is one of them. It's not even close, you'd be crazy to go conventional.

680ish to 700ish is where you can go either way and it not be crazy, over 700 usually you stick with conventional. 

Yea it's a full point and a half more... I guess I just want to make sure I make the right decision. I'm not sure why I'm so afraid of later refinancing into a conventional...

about 1.4 pmi on conventional 

fha would be more cash to close, its 3.5% down

I was quoted about 12k on both plus down payment

cash situation is fine, I have it, I would also prefer to keep it in the bank but refinancing down the line scares me as rates may go up even though my credit would be flawless

And yes, I can totally attack it down to 20% easily... 

Raising credit much more is not an option. I need to purchase soon. I've already done everything possible to raise it.

Many lenders make more off fha loans hence my also having slight distrust in the guidance.

Yes I am aware that I will have PMI at a higher rate than an MPI until I pay down 20% of the value which I plan to do by next year. Hence me thinking a conventional would work out better even at a higher rate?

I'm looking into purchasing a single family home in the mid 300s range. Income is more than fine, debt to income is 5%, only issue is credit is only 650. All the lenders I've talked to keep pushing FHA but I'm afraid I'll be stuck with MIP and won't be able to refinance at a decent rate later. Thoughts?