Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Try Pro Features for Free
Start your 7 day free trial. Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties.
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Jacob Pereira

Jacob Pereira has started 31 posts and replied 622 times.

Post: Whats your Cashflow Rule?

Jacob PereiraPosted
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Austin, TX
  • Posts 636
  • Votes 485

I have to disagree with most of the people posting here so far. Benchmarking is a useful metric to see whether your assets are performing, and comparing your numbers to those of others is a good way to see whether your money would be better invested elsewhere. It's true that individual circumstances vary, and to do a full analysis you should include things such as appreciation, tax benefits, self-labor costs, etc. but I do have a quick rule of thumb to use as a first step:

The stock market historically appreciates over time at around 7% annually. So if I can't get a cash-on-cash return of a MINIMUM of 9% (the extra 2% for the extra effort vs just buying an ETF), I know that it's not worth my time to do a deeper analysis, barring unusual circumstances. And I know people will argue that the power of leverage, inflation, mortgage paydown, tax benefits, etc. make it still worthwhile, but for me there's too much work/uncertainty in RE to bank on those secondary income metrics. 

Post: REI vs Realtor

Jacob PereiraPosted
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Austin, TX
  • Posts 636
  • Votes 485

Keep in mind that the REI holds on to a lot more risk and needs more resources than the REA. An REA could easily put $100k of their own money into a project, and pick up the liability of a loan, whereas the REA has to put in time, gas, marketing, and possibly staging, cleaning, and landscaping costs, depending on the property. Both can be very lucrative, but they are quite different jobs. I think @Russell Brazil hit the nail on the head when he said that the highest tier agents make more than almost all investors, but those guys are also superstars.

Post: Do you really need a local lender?

Jacob PereiraPosted
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Austin, TX
  • Posts 636
  • Votes 485
Originally posted by @Laniece Miller:

newbie question, are the smaller local banks limited in the same way the big guys are if they aren't going to sell your loan? Does this mean you might be able to get financing through the small bank but not Freddie or Fannie?  As I said, still a newbie but that's what seems like a possibility.

I'm not sure exactly what you're referring to, Laniece, but I bet @Chris Mason can give you a well-informed response.

Post: Do you really need a local lender?

Jacob PereiraPosted
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Austin, TX
  • Posts 636
  • Votes 485
Originally posted by @Chris Mason:

When folks headhunt me, I ask for three things.

1) Access to their interest rate pricing.

2) Put me on the phone with the regional underwriting manager. 

3) Put me on the phone with your regional operations manager.

4) I'm not interested in talking to you, headhunter/recruiter dude, so go away.

I have found that there is absolutely a trade-off. Have you ever played an RPG where you get to allocate talent/stat points? It's exactly that.

When I see those stunningly low rates, invariably the underwriter can't tell me how many ways Fannie Mae calculates rental income and when each way is applicable, she can't tell me about net loss carryover, if I'm lucky she knows that you add back depreciation, she can't tell me about how to calculate Patronage Income for all the Berkeley-ites that work at worker-owned socialist co-ops, she can't tell me how much you add back for each business mile driven showing up on page 2 of Schedule C of tax returns, she doesn't know how Fannie and Freddie vary for S Corps, has no idea how transfer taxes work in the Bay Area because she is in Narnia, can't tell me anything about the California Association of Realtors Residential Purchase Agreement, et cetera. 

And then I talk to the regional ops manager, and sure enough he can't tell me when the earliest a borrower can lawfully sign loan docs is, if the CD is acknowledged on Thursday and Monday is a national holiday but not a company holiday, he thinks it's impossible to close an FHA deal in <30 days, he isn't aware that Fannie Mae only requires signed 4506-Ts, not returned and processed transcripts, et cetera.

I work for a place that I believe has an excellent balance. Incidentally you can always have any rate appearing on the rate sheet, meaning everyone has identical rates, all that changes is the cost or lender credit for the rate that you happen to find appealing. That is also the best way to rate shop: have everyone hold rate constant and tell you cost or credit for the rate of your choice. Then you know the exact dollar amount of any reliability or service-based premium you might be paying, and you can decide if you want to pay it, or would prefer to risk losing the house entirely.

A company like the one I work at, the lender credit for a given rate might very well be $500 less than what you will get quoted at the jenky place where the underwriter doesn't know how to calculate rental income. But ya know what? We're actually going to close and close on time. Quoted rates/fees are irrelevant if it doesn't close, and/or you miss out on some percentage of the opportunities that are out there because you fell out of contract and/or because the call center person at the 1-800 number isn't available to sell your offer to the listing agent.

Thanks, Chris. I can always count on you to give a response that's thorough, informed, and entertaining all at the same time. Looks like I need to make sure that I'm fully informed and educated on the inner workings of my underwriter, otherwise it could cost me some serious money.

Post: Do you really need a local lender?

Jacob PereiraPosted
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Austin, TX
  • Posts 636
  • Votes 485
Originally posted by @Eric Schleif:

Not sure what type of assets you have financed in the past, but I usually find better deals/terms with non local lenders. I would always reach out to local lenders to have all my bases covered, but they usually are not as competitive in my experience.

Interesting. Do you have a preferred lender with whom you like to work? Just one of the major banks, or a different category of lender?

Post: Do you really need a local lender?

Jacob PereiraPosted
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Austin, TX
  • Posts 636
  • Votes 485

Most investors, bankers, and real estate agents I talk to adamantly argue that you should use a local lender for your real estate deals, but their arguments tend to be things like they know the market and you can meet with them face-to-face. Most of my lenders I've never actually met face-to-face, and I know my market pretty well on my own. Are there other benefits that I don't know about? The online lenders appear to offer significantly better trates.

Post: Property value up 50% in 3 years, what would you do?

Jacob PereiraPosted
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Austin, TX
  • Posts 636
  • Votes 485

@Robert C. has the same idea I had when I first read your question, but I'll take it one step further. First, a few assumptions:

You bought it as owner occupied (I'm assuming this because of your VERY favorable rates)

You've lived in it for at least a year (that's kind of the rule of thumb minimum for owner occupied)

If these assumptions are correct, you still have time to ensure that can have lived there for two of the last five years. I would move back in long enough to ensure that you've lived there for two years and then pull out all the capital gains tax-free, provided that it doesn't appreciate so much that you make more than $500k profit ( a nice problem to have). After that, follow @Steve R.'s advice and open a bottle, although I tend to agree with my fellow marine @Chris Mason that this calls for champagne, rather than wine. 

Post: 8 Weeks to the Day After I Left My Job .......

Jacob PereiraPosted
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Austin, TX
  • Posts 636
  • Votes 485

Congratulations! Can you go more into the specifics of how you were able to achieve such astounding growth in such a short period of time?  

Post: Baltimore Section 8

Jacob PereiraPosted
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Austin, TX
  • Posts 636
  • Votes 485

@Account Closed, I'm not 100% sure as to how it works in places where income discrimination is illegal, but in most states landlords can still dictate that. In most states housing vouchers are not designed to just let people live for free, but rather to subsidize rent for those who need help, although both types tend to qualify. I'm just suggesting that if you choose to go the section 8 route, you're usually better off with a voucher holder who has a job (in other words, has to pay a percentage of their voucher) than one who stays home all day. Obviously if you're in an area where income discrimination is illegal you have to accept all section 8 tenants.

Post: My First Offer

Jacob PereiraPosted
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Austin, TX
  • Posts 636
  • Votes 485

@Ola Dantis, right you are, sir. You have to kiss a lot of frogs to find your prince, as they say.