Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Try Pro Features for Free
Start your 7 day free trial. Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties.
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Benjamin Cowles

Benjamin Cowles has started 92 posts and replied 441 times.

Originally posted by @Aaron Vergason:

After depreciation I haven't shown positive income with my rentals since I started buying/ holding. Would that mean that wouldn't help me with convential?

I only buy with portfolio loans. The rate is 5% for 15 years and it's a 5/1ARM. Conventional would allow me to spread over 30 years, right? How do people get that without a high paying w2 job?

 Seller financing? OPM?

Thanks for all the replies.  So it looks like I'm just getting a taste of the resistance I'll be facing between myself and GOOD DEALS.  So it's gonna be a tight wiggle between price and reasonable terms which with what I'm currently considering doesn't look like any room for a deal.  

Which makes me wonder if it's common to negotiate over cashflow, like 'mr. seller, I'll seriously consider whatever price and terms you have in mind so long as it allows me a certain amount of cashflow, so we can sit down and have a beer together 10 years down the road to talk business...' as a starting point.

With my zero experience I'm clueless as to what happens on the next step, in general.  Like, out of the next 100 investment properties sold in a given area, how many are sold at a price and terms that cashflows for the buyer/investor?  Who are my competition?  For duplexes would the majority be similar investors, or are there a lot of more casual investors with more cash to spend?  So it's like I'm shooting in the dark.  Kinda fun, a little.  Won't miss it though once I get some light.  

I'll be interested in any further replies but I think I'll try that starting point, especially with anyone that identifies themselves at all as an investor.  Cashflow is what it's all going to boil down to anyway right?  

Originally posted by @Tom S.:

@Benjamin Cowles  My 2 cents, if you need to amortize it over many years just to make it cash flow, it prob isn't a good deal.  

I've been buying and selling for about 15 years now, and the last few deals I've been able to get good CF with a 15 year amortization loan.  As an example, $75k loan @ 15 years = $575 monthly payment, and the rental income = $1400.  The deals are out there; you just have to search and be patient. 

Good luck!

- Tom

 Thanks.  Another thing I'm wondering about, is when working out a deal with another investor  offering financing especially, shouldn't it be in their best to help come up with something that will ultimately work out for the buyer.. -unless of course they were expecting you to default at some point then recover the property?  

And if indeed that is the case most of the time, should the negotiations revolve in most part around buyer's ability to one, cashflow, then most importantly refinance down the road to avoid the potential to default?

Originally posted by @Stephanie Medellin:

They used to have 40 year loans but those are gone.  Highest I know of right now is 30 years.  

 Thanks. When you say "they" are you talking about banks? Or are there particular guidelines one must legally follow when creating a loan agreement? So far all I've gathered is you can negotiate any terms you want unless you're loaning to a homeowner. 

thank you. Yeah, I used those numbers,  just didn't want make my post too long. And yes I've proposed he finance the majority. Not interested at the moment. Perhaps later...

So I've just been cramming my brain with the subject of commercial lending. I called a number for a small 3 unit commercial building. By his asking price and terms, 1/2 he'd finance and indicated room for negotiation, looks like 6% cap rate.

Then there's refinancing issue right? Don't get in if you can't get out? And in the end it all has to cash flow. 

Okay, so what's most important here? and what is least? Or are they all equally important or am I missing something entirely? It's in good condition, all units filled and on the main strip. 

I've little knowledge on this business but my imagination tells me with a little TLC and educated negotiation I could tweak up that cap a good bit. IDK. You tell me.

So obviously it needs to cash flow but by how much? Is there a % minimum you go by? Should I try to at least get a 5 year balloon and worry about refinancing later?

I'm thinking the cap rate at his initial asking price could work if he financed most of it otherwise it I had to partner up partners would need a better cap rate and change numbers accordingly. 

Realistically I'm just hoping to learn either I was missing something to complete the deal or it just wasn't possible or its my lucky day. Either way I'm looking towards my next lead. I just want to see me quicker to the draw with my knowledge in the future. 

Am I on the right page? The right book even lol? Thanks for any and all comments!

Originally posted by @Christopher Telles:

...

Every investor is different but true NOI includes the above and it's more like gross rents X .19 = NOI

 You mean gross rents x .81 right?

Post: Calculating RE Taxes using NOI

Benjamin CowlesPosted
  • Cape Coral, FL
  • Posts 469
  • Votes 32

hmm, good question. Wish I knew

Wait a sec, isn't a loan amortized over a huge amount of time, 100+, basically a loan amortized over a normal amount of time with interest only payments anyway? With the balloon they function the same no?

suppose a seller will finance and doesnt want to budge on price or interest, can you just increase the amortization period til the payments get low enough to cash flow?

I think Ive heard of 50 years but nothing beyond that. suppose you'd need it to be 100-300 to work. Assuming there would be a balloon payment, does it matter? Any reason why it wouldnt work or are there other strategies im missing that would normally solve this problem?

Would offering interest only payments for a period of time be a common strategy overcome this challenge? Sounds more costly over a 300 yr amortized loan but I just have never seen anything like that.