Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Try Pro Features for Free
Start your 7 day free trial. Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties.
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Kenneth Leung

Kenneth Leung has started 1 posts and replied 2 times.

I called the local PHA and was informed that, as you have all stated, it is possible for the PM to have already signed an agreement with the tenant. The PHA advises their clients not to sign before inspection in the event that the inspection does not pass, but cannot enforce it. 

I also asked 2 different individuals at the PHA and both stated that participating in the HCV program is voluntary, even while California law states it is illegal to discriminate based on income status. This seems like a very gray area. 

We have a SFH that we have been renting out through a PM company for several years. Recently, we have been having issues with the PM company involving our most recent tenant ending their lease and re-listing the property.

The PM company is no longer serving in our best interests and we wish to terminate our relationship. However, PM is now stating that they already have a section 8 tenant approved and that if we choose to terminate our relationship, we are still obligated to carry out the tenancy. I am not opposed to section 8, but it is new to me and I am unfamiliar with the process, rules, and regulations. 

1) PM claims the lease agreement has been signed. To my knowledge, PHA has not performed their initial inspection. Is it even possible that PM has a signed lease and taken a deposit at this stage? From my reading, inspection has to be passed before signing the HAP and then signing the lease agreement with the applicant. 

2) I understand that in California, it is illegal to discriminate against an applicant because of their income source including government vouchers. However, does this mean that you are necessarily required to participate in the HCV program? The resources on the HUD website seem to suggest it is voluntary. I would think it cannot be mandated because as an owner, you are required to undergo initial inspection, make necessary repairs, and undergo repeat inspections in the future, which would put undue pressure on the owner simply because an applicant has a voucher.

Thank you all. Very interested in learning more.