David Doyle and Jason A. I agree in California it is a puzzle to lease option and then assign the deal. I know throughout the process you think,
What if this happens?
What if that happens?
I ask you,
[b]Can you do any of the following in California, with a DRE CA Lic?
-Lease as a principle and assign?
-Option as a principle and assign?
-Lease Purchase as a principle and Assign?
-Sub2 as a principle and Assign?
-Wrap AITD as a principle and assign?
-Mirror Wrap AITD?
-Contract for Sale (like a CFD) as a principle and assign?[/b]
I think the right RE Attorney in your corner with the right language in your agreements will serve you well, especially an attorney that knows the DRE regulations.
I am not an attorney.
But I have used a CFO (Contract for Option to Purchase) for many years.
I wrote about the CFO here http://www.biggerpockets.com/blogs/3/blog_posts/25788-cfo-and-a-lease
RE: The CFO -
The key to this is you use
- a lease and
- a contract for option to purchase
It is a landlord tenant relationship with the lease
You have to finish the lease as a condition for the CFO.
The Option is drawn ahead of time and held in escrow for the buyer, and the buyer has a short time to get the mortgage.
The Option is not in the possession of the end buyer until the lease is finished (addresses the equitable interest issue).
Conclusion:
If you are Licensed in California:
Do not close LO assignments on the kitchen table with no witnesses or notary.
Realize that the courts will always side with the inexperienced Seller or TBer and not you the REI
Do close these in the Attorney's office in California with all the disclosures and releases of liability.
There are alot of lawsuits in California.
(As William Shakespeare said, 'The first thing we do, let's kill all the lawyers)
And, again, do not do LOAs in California if you are not comfortable with the risk and have an Attorney to close sellers and tenant buyers.
BTW If you are a Licensed Agent, you can charge a fee to bring people together (act agent for) and assist in a Lease Purchase transaction, can you not? Like a Marketing Coach to find sellers and find tenant buyers? Perhaps that is an avenue for you to pursue. And not do assignments. Be a coach. Or sell information on how to do it themselves.
Best of luck to you both.
FYI, there are millions of houses that have no equity in Los Angeles. They do not have to be upside down, just 10% or less equity, thin deals from WE BUY HOUSES guys.
Home Sellers need good solutions to sell on terms.
Home Buyers need lease option financing now.
INMO, even if there is risk for the Owner that the TBer will not get financing soon, at least their PITI Payment will get paid (or most of it) and they will avoid a distressed sale.
Is this better than the Seller renting to an unproven tenant and feeding the difference of rent - property manager fees and - maintenance?
Is this better than the Seller paying from savings to get rid of a house that has no equity or little equity or a small negative equity?
I think so.
Up to you to decide.
Brian