All Forum Posts by: Scott Scharl
Scott Scharl has started 72 posts and replied 205 times.
Post: Liquidity for Limited Partners

- Colorado Springs, CO
- Posts 229
- Votes 58
@Amy Wan specifically the security tokens. I've heard mention of the before, and as I understand they're still fairly cutting-edge. Do you know of any good thought leaders/ blogs/ podcasts about them that I should follow?
Post: Entrepreneurs: Don't Invest in Real Estate

- Colorado Springs, CO
- Posts 229
- Votes 58
@James Theron Erwin III thanks for your thoughts!
Post: Liquidity for Limited Partners

- Colorado Springs, CO
- Posts 229
- Votes 58
@Amy Wan that’s very interesting. Who can I follow or what can I read to learn more about that?
Post: Liquidity for Limited Partners

- Colorado Springs, CO
- Posts 229
- Votes 58
@Eamonn McElroy thanks for your thoughts. I'm just wondering if there's anything in between publicly traded REIT and 5-7 yr lockup private syndication. Is this where crowdfunding comes in?
Post: Liquidity for Limited Partners

- Colorado Springs, CO
- Posts 229
- Votes 58
@Lance Lvovsky @Alina Trigub @Theo Hicks thanks for you comments. Here's my thought, at its core: If an LP was looking at two otherwise similar syndication opportunities, but one was easier to liquidate, wouldn't the LP choose the more liquid PPM every time?
Post: Syndicators — Your #1 Problem

- Colorado Springs, CO
- Posts 229
- Votes 58
@Justin Kane what does a full-time promoter look like? Planning live events? Making sales calls? Hosting webinars? How could somebody turn your need into a business that can serve many businesses like yours?
Post: Syndicators — Your #1 Problem

- Colorado Springs, CO
- Posts 229
- Votes 58
@Jake S. thanks for your thoughts here. By monthly/weekly asset management, what do you mean exactly?
Post: Entrepreneurs: Don't Invest in Real Estate

- Colorado Springs, CO
- Posts 229
- Votes 58
If you could start a company to solve 1 main problem in the real estate investing world (but not actually invest in real estate itself), what company would you build?
Post: Liquidity for Limited Partners

- Colorado Springs, CO
- Posts 229
- Votes 58
@Jay Hinrichs
Thanks, I appreciate this discussion. To go a bit further—
I understand why the GP would usually be unable to just buy back shares anytime due to lack of capital in the first place.
But what if the LP could sell to another person outside the partnership? Does that start to get into SEC type issues, or just a risk where the GP wants to be able to vet all the investors in their deal? What if the LP had option to sell to a third party with the GP’s approval?
Post: Liquidity for Limited Partners

- Colorado Springs, CO
- Posts 229
- Votes 58
@Jay Hinrichs
If there were a General Partner that offered some form of liquidity to LPs, wouldn’t that make their deal comparatively more attractive than other syndication?
What are the legal and/or business reasons that the GPs do not want liquidity for their LPs?