Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime

Let's keep in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter for timely insights and actionable tips on your real estate journey.

By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions
×
Try Pro Features for Free
Start your 7 day free trial. Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties.
Followed Discussions Followed Categories Followed People Followed Locations
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Wayne Petit

Wayne Petit has started 1 posts and replied 2 times.

Hi Chris @Chris Mason

Thanks for the reply. What you are saying makes sense and I can definitely see where the DTI goes down as more cashflow positive properties are acquired over time. I should have been more clear in my example.... I was referring to new or "first time" investors with average/modest income who are trying to get started. Even when buying that first rental property and getting a traditional loan requires you to have the income to cover that loan cost. That's the part I never see addressed by anyone when talking about getting started.

I'm sure someone has asked this question before but I can't seem to find an answer. I often read this scenario on BP or other real estate posts about buying/financing rental homes. The assumption is if a person has $100K to spend they could theoretically but 4-5 houses (costing around $100K each) since they could put down 20% on home and finance the remaining 80%. But I never see anyone address the fact of how do they get Financed for the loan without having the income to carry those other mortgages? I've read so many examples of people stating as long as you have the 20% you automatically can by the home. I used to be a Mortgage lender and it doesn't work that way in the real world. The borrower needs to show sufficient income to carry all those loans + PITI. I understand that if they get a rental lease on one of the homes they can declare most of that as income for the next loan they get, but you still have to show enough income to carry the first loan and your personal home mortgage (if you have one). You have to buy the home first (then possibly rehab) and then find a tenant.

Am I missing something here?   Is there some technique or finance trick that would allow someone to purchase multiple homes at once if they just the 20% down?   Is there a way to declare some of the rental income before you buy the house.. if you had a interested tenant who would sign a lease ahead of time?

Thanks for the advice.....