Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Try Pro Features for Free
Start your 7 day free trial. Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties.
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Account Closed

Account Closed has started 21 posts and replied 404 times.

Post: Do you ever purchase a property subject to with negative cash flow?

Account ClosedPosted
  • Investor
  • Phoenix, AZ
  • Posts 420
  • Votes 387
Quote from @Jay Hinrichs:
Quote from @Account Closed:
Quote from @Account Closed:
Quote from @Account Closed:
Quote from @Account Closed:

For crying out loud…you’re getting some bad advice. If a property does -$100 cash flow per month but you’re 16 years into the amortization doing subject to and the principle paydown each month is $1000…I’m doing that deal all day long. Particularly if the downpayment is slim. Two years from now that property will break even on cash flow and with no appreciation whatsoever it will put $12,000 of equity in your pocket. Nevermind the tax advantages. 

I repeat, I’m doing this kind of deal ALL DAY LONG.  



If you're 16 years into the amortization, the seller has plenty of equity and would list, rather than sell Subject To.


The contract I’m currently in escrow on says differently.  

Congratulations. Is the seller getting any cash out?

the OP is not the same as what Whit is talking about would need all of whits numbers to really reply to the position he is taking.. OP had negative cash flow of 1k a month not 100 dollars.

The principle is the same, but for the record I would not touch the deal the OP is considering. He asked if we EVER do it, and I illustrated a situation where we absolutely do. There are MANY more like it, but as you said, all elements to the transaction play a role. 

Post: Do you ever purchase a property subject to with negative cash flow?

Account ClosedPosted
  • Investor
  • Phoenix, AZ
  • Posts 420
  • Votes 387
Quote from @Steve K.:
Quote from @Account Closed:

I assume when you say cash flow that all opex and capex are already factored in. In the scenario I described I’m making $1000/month while my cash flow is -$100. Im waiting 2 years to break even cash flow wise, but I’m clearing $1000/month in principle paydown from day 1. That’s $12k for the year. $12k+ on $25k every year is absolutely in my wheel house. My original investment is paid back entirely in just over 2 years. 


 Even using your best-possible-case scenario, there are many better ways to invest $25k IMO. And there is a lot that can go wrong here (opex and capex not accurately accounted for, property value or rents go down, tenant issues, seller files for bankruptcy, issues with loan servicer (I've experienced this one), insurance issues, mortgage company exercises their right to call the loan due on sale, title issues, judgements etc. there is a lot that can wrong with subto). I look at real estate through a risk vs. reward lens and would much rather put $25k elsewhere and make more money faster with less risk personally. 


Most of those same risks outside of the DOSC apply to every other transaction. There are risks and there are rewards. They are asymmetrical IMHO. Don’t kid yourself though, deals where you can make your money back in 2 years without any sweat equity…well they don’t just grow on trees…otherwise everyone would do it. 

Post: Do you ever purchase a property subject to with negative cash flow?

Account ClosedPosted
  • Investor
  • Phoenix, AZ
  • Posts 420
  • Votes 387
Quote from @Account Closed:
Quote from @Account Closed:

For crying out loud…you’re getting some bad advice. If a property does -$100 cash flow per month but you’re 16 years into the amortization doing subject to and the principle paydown each month is $1000…I’m doing that deal all day long. Particularly if the downpayment is slim. Two years from now that property will break even on cash flow and with no appreciation whatsoever it will put $12,000 of equity in your pocket. Nevermind the tax advantages. 

I repeat, I’m doing this kind of deal ALL DAY LONG.  



If you're 16 years into the amortization, the seller has plenty of equity and would list, rather than sell Subject To.


The contract I’m currently in escrow on says differently.  

Post: Due On Sale Clause About to Become More Common?

Account ClosedPosted
  • Investor
  • Phoenix, AZ
  • Posts 420
  • Votes 387
Quote from @Steve K.:
Quote from @JD Martin:
Quote from @Account Closed:

I disagree. The people doing subject-to are quite sophisticated and typically have quite the platform. Imagine Pace decides to blast a bank calling his notes due to an audience of millions on YouTube. You think that doesn’t affect the bank stock/image? You think that won’t catch a news cycle? Have you heard of GameStop? How about Reddit? How about Budweiser?


 I guarantee it won't catch anything. People who are involved in anything tend to have an overinflated sense of self, ego and importance. Real estate investing is just one subset of any type of investing, residential (what most sub2 is) is another subset of that, and "creative" purchasing is a tiny subset of that. Don't conflate the one-off thing with Gamestop with what real investors with real money have on their radar. With all due respect, Pace is a nobody just like I'm a nobody and you're a nobody. He's probably less of a nobody than either of us, at least in terms of social media, but his 250k followers and 50k worth of views on his videos probably doesn't even place him in the top 10 thousand users. Bigger Pockets has over 1 million followers on Youtube and I guarantee if you walked out in the street tomorrow and asked the first random 100 people you saw if they knew what it was, you'd be unlikely to get even 1 correct answer. 

Sub2 is a nobody in a subset of nobody in a subset of "yeah I've heard of that but I have no idea what it is".


 I've been in real estate for a minute and the first time I heard of Pace was Friday night when his followers started spamming the forums with a bunch of BS. Not a great first impression. 

Well Steve, I don’t know how to tell you this…but Pace had a show in A&E 2 years ago, rubs elbows with Grant Cardone, wrote a book for BP, and is all over social media. So while it may be your first impression, it’s not everyone’s. 

Post: Due On Sale Clause About to Become More Common?

Account ClosedPosted
  • Investor
  • Phoenix, AZ
  • Posts 420
  • Votes 387
Quote from @JD Martin:
Quote from @Account Closed:

I disagree. The people doing subject-to are quite sophisticated and typically have quite the platform. Imagine Pace decides to blast a bank calling his notes due to an audience of millions on YouTube. You think that doesn’t affect the bank stock/image? You think that won’t catch a news cycle? Have you heard of GameStop? How about Reddit? How about Budweiser?


 I guarantee it won't catch anything. People who are involved in anything tend to have an overinflated sense of self, ego and importance. Real estate investing is just one subset of any type of investing, residential (what most sub2 is) is another subset of that, and "creative" purchasing is a tiny subset of that. Don't conflate the one-off thing with Gamestop with what real investors with real money have on their radar. With all due respect, Pace is a nobody just like I'm a nobody and you're a nobody. He's probably less of a nobody than either of us, at least in terms of social media, but his 250k followers and 50k worth of views on his videos probably doesn't even place him in the top 10 thousand users. Bigger Pockets has over 1 million followers on Youtube and I guarantee if you walked out in the street tomorrow and asked the first random 100 people you saw if they knew what it was, you'd be unlikely to get even 1 correct answer. 

Sub2 is a nobody in a subset of nobody in a subset of "yeah I've heard of that but I have no idea what it is".

I expect you’re right because the DOSC won’t be enforced in mass. If it were…you bet your *** that the real estate world would hear about the lender who is initiating a ton of foreclosures. And 100 out of 100 people know what a foreclosure is. 

Post: Due On Sale Clause About to Become More Common?

Account ClosedPosted
  • Investor
  • Phoenix, AZ
  • Posts 420
  • Votes 387
Quote from @Steve K.:
Quote from @Account Closed:

The point of having the clause should be obvious. It is there to protect their interest and the minute a mortgage is in trouble, you better believe they’ll enforce it. 

The difference between now and the 1980’s are vast…but the PR piece alone should be telling. Nothing screams “we are in trouble” like accelerating performing 30 year mortgages. Stock prices don’t like signs of trouble. 

If the mortgage is in trouble that would trigger a foreclosure. DOS is for when the title transfers to a new owner (who has not been vetted by the bank, and without the bank's permission). Not really seeing the PR angle either, sorry. Not many people really know what subto is, and when presented with the conecpet, many think it's kind of shady. And like JD pointed out, a tiny percentage of transactions are made using seller financing, and an even smaller percentage of those are done using subject to. I don't think it would make any headlines even if all those loans were called tomorrow, and with foreclosure rates being as low as they are, the banks could probably resell those properties quickly at higher interest rates, pocket new closing costs, get low interest loans making less than inflation off the books, etc. Just food for thought here, all the hype around subto lately got me thinking, it's not even a strategy I typically employ but like to have in my back pocket in the rare case when it makes sense.

I know what the DOSC is for, and banks are more inclined to use it when payments start rolling in late.

As for the quick turn around you described…. You’re forgetting the part where the foreclosure takes 12-18 months and the bank has no payments coming in during that time.  As for the PR angle…you don’t have to know what subto is. If you hear that one bank is foreclosing on a lot of people, what is your reaction going to be? 

Post: Do you ever purchase a property subject to with negative cash flow?

Account ClosedPosted
  • Investor
  • Phoenix, AZ
  • Posts 420
  • Votes 387

I assume when you say cash flow that all opex and capex are already factored in. In the scenario I described I’m making $1000/month while my cash flow is -$100. Im waiting 2 years to break even cash flow wise, but I’m clearing $1000/month in principle paydown from day 1. That’s $12k for the year. $12k+ on $25k every year is absolutely in my wheel house. My original investment is paid back entirely in just over 2 years. 

Post: Due On Sale Clause About to Become More Common?

Account ClosedPosted
  • Investor
  • Phoenix, AZ
  • Posts 420
  • Votes 387

I disagree. The people doing subject-to are quite sophisticated and typically have quite the platform. Imagine Pace decides to blast a bank calling his notes due to an audience of millions on YouTube. You think that doesn’t affect the bank stock/image? You think that won’t catch a news cycle? Have you heard of GameStop? How about Reddit? How about Budweiser?

Post: Due On Sale Clause About to Become More Common?

Account ClosedPosted
  • Investor
  • Phoenix, AZ
  • Posts 420
  • Votes 387

The point of having the clause should be obvious. It is there to protect their interest and the minute a mortgage is in trouble, you better believe they’ll enforce it. 

The difference between now and the 1980’s are vast…but the PR piece alone should be telling. Nothing screams “we are in trouble” like accelerating performing 30 year mortgages. Stock prices don’t like signs of trouble. 

Post: Do you ever purchase a property subject to with negative cash flow?

Account ClosedPosted
  • Investor
  • Phoenix, AZ
  • Posts 420
  • Votes 387

For crying out loud…you’re getting some bad advice. If a property does -$100 cash flow per month but you’re 16 years into the amortization doing subject to and the principle paydown each month is $1000…I’m doing that deal all day long. Particularly if the downpayment is slim. Two years from now that property will break even on cash flow and with no appreciation whatsoever it will put $12,000 of equity in your pocket. Nevermind the tax advantages. 

I repeat, I’m doing this kind of deal ALL DAY LONG.