There’s only space for a compact drop in cook top with 2 burners.

That reduces the value of doing a full cost segregation study at this stage because the tax benefits will be proportionally limited.However, once you move out and convert the whole property to a short-term rental (STR), your depreciation deductions—including those from a cost seg study—would apply to the entire property.

You could always test your assumptions by giving them a few properties and seeing if the proportion of short-lived assets showed a lot of variance.You could have an input for taxable income (state and federal) and calculate the savings based on the tax grids. 

That is not to take anything away from the other excellent brokers in my area or that I work with regularly - but nobody offers the breadth of coverage, or proportion of quality closed STR sales or client performance (at least that I'm familiar with..) 

Ned's rule of guru courses is:              "the value is inversely proportional to the price."

Payments are then split proportionally and deposited directly into each IRA.Tax Implications: Income earned (interest) is tax-deferred or tax-free depending on whether the SDIRA is traditional or Roth.

That is prima facie Absurd, as the definition of risk is the interest rate that merits a certain Risk, ie directly proportional. 

Most tech high-quality Tech coders are very good in .......... coding , making code efficient, calling different system call library and make optimization such as comparing performance in multi-threading environment, verifying ASIC logic with different memory size lol , in short most tech folks fits into Chief Architect capacity.But for real estate due diligence, LP need to have Chief Financial Officer capability, ability to read and understand financial proforma, forecasting revenue and understanding macro economic compact with certain interest rate sensitive.

Quote from @Jason Malabute: You can’t use a Solo 401(k) or Roth IRA to fund a capital call originally made by your personal trust, even if the funds go into a different equity class—doing so creates an indirect benefit to a disqualified person (you or your trust), which is a prohibited transaction under IRS rules.Would contributing only the solo 401k’s proportional share of the cap call (assuming the sponsor clearly segments that amount into preferred equity linked only to the 401k’s original interest) still be a prohibited transaction?

It should probably take a relative proportion based on that classification, so ~5% give or take.