By the way, this's a joke.

i would not sell one of my new builds to anyone using Rocket they are a joke in a half on that aspect. 

No joke.

If you have any further questions or would like more details about my experience, please feel free to reach out.Thank you for reading, and I hope my story helps others make informed decisions.Best regards,Matt U should see the 1 post schills posting now.. what a joke.

He was the brunt of jokes about bad real estate courses at all most all every real estate investing seminars back in the pre ZOOM days.

Publishing criteria (like “3x rent income” or “650+ credit”) is fine, but it can open you up to unnecessary back-and-forth or legal gray areas if phrased wrong.Best practice:Keep your criteria written down internally (income, credit, rental history, etc.).Apply those same standards to every applicant and keep a record of your process.When someone inquires, you can share your criteria in writing or over email so everyone gets the same info — that’s what shows consistency.If you want, I can share a quick example of a fair housing–friendly screening checklist I use with my clients, just message me and I’ll send it over.

It's also amazing how unsecured some of these properties are, we can go look at a property and I'll go into the backyard and my husband jokes that he half expects me to come walking out the front door...unlocked bulkhead doors, windows, back doors, etc.

And anytime I hear the phrase "crushing it" an alarm goes off in my head, like "don't trust this person!"

An earlier engineering report I saw even used the scary phrase "structurally significant settlement."

You might want to rework your listing headline and description to highlight phrases like “future development corridor,” “R10 zoning — RV park/campground potential,” or “income-producing transitional property.”