(The interpretation actually offers several acceptable sources.)Now: What happens if a reader interprets the original statement to mean they can demand that the requesting party supply a prescription for an assistance animal from only an MD or a Psychologist?

The "legal" prescriptions available to treat my Degenerative Disk Disease and Spondylolisthesis would leave me unable to get out of bed, sick to my stomach, and even worsen my pain. 

I'm a nurse who would much rather implement a prescription for exercise then a ten min and push a pill doctor visit with no follow up from doctor. 

An licensed attorney from Minnesota came advise you on issues of "adverse possession" or whether or not you have a "prescriptive easement".

I am not talking about taking trips around the world, I am talking about paying for prescription pills and assisted living.

If this happened long enough ago, each state varies in length, the former owner could have acquired an easement by prescription, or possiblyou adversely possessed the portion of land.

But that's not a prescriptive regulation.  

Patti's timelines are correct but they're not prescriptive regulations. 

I think the reason for the crazy responses is not because "everyone on FB is crazy" but the formatting of the ads by FB and allowing the ability to instantly send a pre-scripted question that doesnt even relate to the ad..  

If not, people might just say they need to smoke "medical mari" for treatment and cannot show you the actual medical mari prescription.