Originally posted by @Mark Sookram:Personally fair which derives from lack of education and encouragement are the biggest factor when it comes to making a decision where you don't have the guidance, encouragement and education.

I won’t bore you with the math to derive correlations, but I will explain a bit on how to interpret them.

From a mortgage appraiser of 14 years,If appraised for the bank, who typically go with FNMA Guidelines, the bank will not secure the property according to a value derived through the Income Approach to value, only the Sales Comparison Approach to value.

The shorter tenor is easier for the lender to hedge the interest rate risk when it's providing the borrower a fixed rate loan (that's not done through a derivative).  

First off, the service in question and any derivative of this service, is a fringe service.

If it is multi family, the value is generally derived based on the rents, which is different than a single family.

In general:In any suit between an LLC and a third party (that is, not a member), diversity jurisdiction depends on the citizenship of each LLC member at the time the lawsuit is filed.In any suit between an LLC and a member, diversity jurisdiction is impossible.In an LLC-related suit among members of an LLC, diversity jurisdiction depends on whether the LLC is an indispensable party (even assuming the litigating members are diverse).In any derivative lawsuit brought on behalf an LLC, diversity jurisdiction depends on the citizenship of each LLC member at the time the lawsuit is filed and is impossible in all but very limited circumstances.Hence, subject matter and diversity matter jurisdiction to answer your question. 

Also doesn't the seller potentially derive benefits from a wholesale deal if they cant find anyone to take the properties of their hands?

How does a retiree derive income from their portfolio?  

Your investment income is derived from renting out the other units.