Knowing this, all investors should set out on a daily basis with the goal of eliminating premises liability exposures, exceed the implied warranty of habitability standards; be responsive and reasonable with tenants; Screen and work with- licensed and appropriately insured contractors, property managers, brokers; Use contract management to shift risks and defense; avoid your own conduct and conduct of others that arises to negligence and certainly gross negligence.

Screening is your first line of defense against rental risk, so it’s worth using a provider that goes beyond the basics.When comparing options, focus on three things:Depth of data.

A well-designed asset protection strategy limits liability, preserves wealth, and strengthens your defenses if challenges arise.To navigate these areas with confidence, build a team that includes a tax professional experienced in real estate and an asset protection attorney aligned with your long-term goals.

Screening is your first line of defense in reducing rental risk—cutting corners there can cost far more down the road.Cheaper report costs usually mean cheaper data: automated pulls, incomplete records, and no human review.

(A lot of policies quietly exclude Airbnb-type stays.)Are you covered for legal defense costs?

Defense they can get from China and Russia without our questioning their social and political alignments.  

First will be roof condition (less than 20 years), roof material, defensible space, overhanging trees, plumbing, and wiring.

Paying a professional gives you peace of mind that it’s done right and defensible if ever audited.

But creating this and other straw man arguments as a defense, does make things look shady.

Which study do you think has more audit defensibility?