I feel like they need us to terminate the lease in order to get a new long term tenant in there but they are not at all willing to concede anything, ie give us an early termination date that will exist no matter the outcome of the new possible tenant.  

What I have seen is Hcd has no means to enforce squat against jurisdictions that ignore hcd’s direction but maybe the jurisdiction will voluntarily concede to the Hcd interpretation. 

I concede rent all the time.. last winter when it was cold I let tenants go 3 months without paying so they could afford heat then they just moved out when they needed to start again.But then again rental income to me is inconsequential to what I do..and so I don't focus on it much.things like this..

Or giving them a lowball offer at the risk of offending them, and hope to give them a "win" by eventually conceding to my original ideal/max price.This may seem like a basic question, however in your experience, which types of offers have you had positive experiences with?  

As much as technology has made things easier I just think there are some intangibles I'm not convinced we should concede. 

Hopefully, the seller will concede on the price but just in case I want to make sure I'm protected.

Now she keeps telling us the seller’s will not concede an inch and has been very tough to deal with.  

I concede that maybe there was a misunderstanding, but my wife and I need a phase I to make an educated purchase, so we will pay for it out of our own pockets. 

You’re simply conceding that negotiation to the seller.When Not to Use ResolutionsFirst, I should note that when buying a fixer “as is,” it’s expected there will be no such resolution.

I had one additional interaction with the PO but he ended up conceding that the house was legally sold at auction and that he has no right be be there.