My logic is if I can help pay these off with my W2 within 6 years my cash flow should be about $500-$600 per property ($3000 per month cash flow conservatively).

So the logic would be like this:Many investors think that country X is unsafe while it is actually very safe.Here is the proof that it is safe.Now, you’re at an advantage because you have a view if the market that is more accurate than most investors.Is the logic valid?

Quote from @Stuart Udis: He can't appropriately care for investors hard earned money but he's is out there teaching others how to raise capital....seems logical. 

Please note the information provided below is a layman's definition designed to provide a basic understanding for the general audience.

DM us if you’d like to discuss this logical approach in greater detail!

The company will be fully running in 2025 and is in the process of raising capital (32:47-50).This evidence showcases a pattern by Santarelli of raising money, by offering returns that defy logic.

However, i've never really seen the logic in taking those paths when you can just take the safe and slow approach. 

Let's try to bring some LOGIC to all of this:)Big companies, with an office, secretary, salesman, company car, has paid advertising, etc. will do free bids - but, you'll be paying top of the market prices for everything!

You can expand your audience by mixing both in-person and online strategies.

DM us if you’d like to discuss this logical approach in greater detail!