Debating one over the other is splitting hairs, if you ask me.

Human nature.

It's just the nature of the business.

This is simply predatory in nature full stop.I have sold many of my OREO props on low down ZERO percent financing but they were at market prices and the buyers owned them free and clear in 24 to 36 months that works.. but long term contracts on these homes is not a solution for neighborhood revitalization just the opposite.  

It's created an interesting dynamic where the tenants who naturally may have filled the lower graded units are being given the opportunity to fill better quality housing options.

Naturally there's going to be other sorts of physical, site, reporting, and neighborhood due diligence you're going to want to do in order to make sure you're not "playing stupid games to win stupid prizes".

Your Natural Hazards Disclosure should have some of this but it is tricky.I think if the equity is there and you can move the money to a better producing asset, I think I would sell.

Affordability will naturally go back down.1.  

But I do know in order to fairly evaluate these ultra high risk offering the investor needs to (1) wait for the entire projected project period to end and (2) invest across multiple offerings so the natural “failures” and “successes” result on a statically verifiable range.  

People come for the lake, the bike trails and nature of course.