8 March 2020 | 20 replies
Thanks Bob, I've been reading some older forums and I was coming to the same general conclusion.
2 November 2021 | 28 replies
SO you are taking the wrong conclusion that the behavior of people clicking on your ads look and feel like those in desperate need to sell.Your data does NOT represent motivated sellers.
9 August 2023 | 23 replies
@David Edwards I read three sections in combination and drew the conclusion that a detached structure in lot less than 20,000sf can only be used for storage, greenhouse purpose, and in lot larger than 20,000sf they can only be used as Guest Cottage for non-paying occupants.
3 May 2020 | 10 replies
According to this post, for a $180k property, you'd be paying almost $19k in total FHA insurance costs as opposed to $5.1k for conventional PMI.My conclusion is that, unless you are extremely pressed to buy a house before building a good enough credit score and downpayment, you should absolutely wait to get a conventional loan instead of going for an FHA loan.
9 November 2018 | 38 replies
Should anyone still want to buy an IKEA kitchen at IKEA, here is my review of the appointment / assembly process, which she/he should plan with: 11.05.2017 1.surveying appointment at home: normal 15.05.2017 1.planing apptmt at IKEA: normal 12.06.2017 1.installation apptmt at home: Planning error (measures copied incorrectly), broken kitchen appliances, broken TV, cabinet gaps, no worktop 13.06.2017 2.planing apptmt at IKEA: complete replaning due to 40cm length planing error 28.06.2017 2.installation apptmt: incorrect parts delivery, scratched, incorrectly cut worktop, broken rear wall 04.07.2017 2.surveying apptmt: new measurement for worktop 13.11.2017 3.installation apptmt: worktop supplied by 5cm too narrow 02.06.2018 4.installation apptmt: worktop supplied by 2cm too wide & 2cm too short about 12 repetitive hotline calls (always longer than 30min) including waiting loop 10 WASTE HOLIDAYS 26 Email pure for the coordination of the kitchen installation 43 Email with IKEA "customer service" for the misclaimed "claim settlement" 300 € collateral damage Zero compensation (91 € were offered to me, which I refused) Conclusion: NEVER AGAIN IKEA !!!!!
9 May 2020 | 24 replies
Read through it, and my conclusion is there are so many protections built in for the seller, it doesn't pay if you are an "investor".
7 November 2022 | 78 replies
If you have some case or statute that leads you to a different conclusion, I'd really like to take a look at it.
21 March 2017 | 90 replies
I'm pretty excited to read the conclusion to this harrowing tale of rental rehab.
29 July 2021 | 42 replies
@James Hamling I am coming to this conclusion more and more honestly.
3 April 2022 | 540 replies
I can get as many as I want for all in around 30k, MOST out of state investors cannot Good luck Phew, finally a conclusion we can both agree on.