@Richard Kim wait, but start looking for a new PMC.If you can't find one, start planning to sell.If it goes away, no harm done, just some time spent.

Repeat What’s WorkingIf your current model is giving you strong, predictable cash flow, there's no harm in duplicating it.

No harm there.  

They attempted to force and NDA to prevent the client from being able to share experiences, when refused, they tried on multiple times to express that they were losing money because the BBB complaint, never recognizing or accepting that the problem was the cause of their employee, and rather than fulfill their promises, they spent their efforts shifting blame to the client for taking actions, instead of taking action internally with the employee for putting them on the position of losing money, totally ignoring the losses the client was experiencing due to their false promises and failed promises, and intentional inflection of harm.

Tenant will claim to judge that you are being unfair and embellish the truth with fears about the gas leak harming or killing them.Welcome to the world of proeprty management, where tenants always think they are right and landlords are just cheap rich people.

By rushing to install a tenant that just made the cut, you're potentially passing up more qualified tenants and therefore harming the owner. 

Lead exposure is especially harmful to young children and pregnant women.

No harm no foul.Here’s a quote from one of the wisest and richest kings to ever walk the earth.

She can play along but I would recommend caution.. and if she has not real funding herself there is probably no monitary harm to her.

Again, there is a non-disclosure agreement, an arbitration agreement, an agreement not to post on 3rd party sites like this, and for matters to be resolved privately in order to avoid harming anyone's image and goodwill.