While these choices can be striking and unique, they may not necessarily resonate with a broader audience, especially potential tenants.

If they send you a bill, highly doubtful you will pay it.Their best protection is to start escrowing any funds due to you until the complaint is resolved.A better strategy would be to terminate them and file the complaint afterwards.Which begs the question, what is the logic of having them continue to manage your rental if you're filing a complaint against them?

I am not looking to cut corners, I'm more trying to understand what other people do to see if there's a more logical approach.

However, nothing is full proof but I have a very logical screening process that does not include a standard background check.

Thoughts on this logic?

People are more concerned with their own small region that with the logic of a nation, in terms of nation wide needs.

I totally get the logic Ryan, from my side if you're getting a similar return w/ a market that is slow for part of the year then you have less moving parts and less work. 

Once you have that, it all is logic, data common sense.Getting the contract signed is dealing with people.

All of the HUD sites i see charge money, which im no opposed to paying, but i wanted to check with the BP audience to see the best way to find these homes!

It was easy, logical and expected and very  realistic.