Steve,What can you tell me about low income government grants.

If I were an investor I would rather have something rather than nothing.But I think all Americans would be against letting investors get MORE money from the government than they could get taking a partial loss on their risky investment.

This portfolio of cashflowing investment property was the means by which the royal family in England took in the funds to run the governement and military.

Because they have “toxic assets.†Since we are abandoning free market principals (government bailing out all so called “capitalist business), what this amounts to is that Goldman Sachs, J.P.

I have a very different take on this issue for two reasons. 1) Many tenants (at least in Ohio) have their utilities paid by one or more government agencies.

As most of you know I am an Englishman on this forum and trying hard to catch up on all your jargon, rules and regulations so please forgive me if I have made any serious mistakes in this post and if I have please correct me.First let me say that I think the Idea is a great one and should be investigated more and really the only person that can do this is Joshua because it will involve lawyers and will have a significant effect on Bigger Pockets so I would like to ask him if he is willing.Next point is what is this going to be so far we have had LLC, REIT, 501(c)(3)........!!!

This would likely be around .5-1% higher then the average rate for a CD in your local area.... those are two ways to accomplish what you are trying to do with as little hassle with regulations as possible and with as little interference from uneducated investors.

The same could be said for SEC enforcement officers who turned a blind eye to certain institutions in hopes of securing lucrative employment once they left the SEC, from the very people they were supposed to be regulating.

It also requires a thumb print from applicants and applicants have to take an "examination" provided by the federal government to determine if they are "safe" enough persons to own a gun.

But he would still rather see the government not get involved.I may be mistaken though...