Instead Develop a system complete with a reliable team of attorneys, contractors, realtors (esp. if you're going to sell) etc. and then experienced natural growth.

It was and is a natural gas vehicle,,I paid about $5k for it,,it had about 30k miles, today it has 36k miles, and runs like new.  

Because of the nature of relationships with brokers, I use the word political to describe this dynamic.

.-  If you're going to give me preferential treatment on your deals (bring them to me first), then I'm happy to help you with deals -- determining a reasonable ARV, determining a reasonable offer price, helping with creative solutions, etc.  

I've listened to the recent mobile home episode on the BP podcast, but because of difficult nature of comping this deal, I'd rather share any potential profits in exchange for help from a more experienced investor.  

Green means nature, black means contemporary, red means hot and so on.

In a very special situation I could see lowering it $50 a month for a little while and then returning to the normal rate but even then if other tenants know you will do it they will want that treatment too.

No case law on this yet, but I can see this is where the "3 per entity vs 3 per natural person" debate will be settled, from the abusers like the parks.My question to Dodd Frank / Park experts here is, if I where to buy this land-home operator, what would you do to change the business model to be Dodd Frank compliant. 

Does anyone have any suggestions on how i should go about finding funding for something of this nature?

So the simple logic of it is sell yourself, become the payment, find a way to be of value and to make being mentored a return on value, I mean hey, there an investor right, so they will naturally have to be enticed and interested in a good investment be it a property OR a person.I conclusion; sell yourself, become the appreciating asset, make yourself a good return, and show appreciation opportunities for continued knowledge investment and "yeah shall receive".