I don't interpret the new (2025) statutory language to exclude accrued interest in the public bid amount.

I've pointed out IRC 469(c)(7)(B) and Publication 925, but our CPA is saying that we are interpreting this incorrectly.

However, the local interpretation and enforcement vary widely.

If there are notice requirements, it's often prudent to begin those steps as a precaution but if this is a tenant you believe will catch up once their employment payment freeze ends it's important to communicate your desire for the tenant to stay so they don't interpret the notice incorrectly or completely shut down on you. 

@Leo Parshukov it's NOT the screening app that makes a difference, it's knowing how to interpret the data!

Thanks for sharing @Cory King very thorough breakdown and interpretation. 

Securing the 90% LTV loan construction loan should not be interpreted as deal strength.

I would consult a lawyer and listen to his advice but where I would try to direct this is the lawyer write letter to HOA that they do not agree with the HOA interpretation that the current CC&R does not allow STRs.  

This represents a gray area within the Internal Revenue Code, where taxpayers are currently able to realize certain benefits under the existing interpretation of the law.

Don’t overthink it or waste anyobody’s time, just cut to the chase and ask plainly if the seller is open to any offers using seller financing/ seller carry (I wouldn’t use “creative financing” as that is usually interpreted as BS).