Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime

Let's keep in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter for timely insights and actionable tips on your real estate journey.

By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions
Followed Discussions Followed Categories Followed People Followed Locations
1031 Exchanges
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 3 years ago on . Most recent reply presented by

User Stats

3
Posts
1
Votes
Dat Nguyen
1
Votes |
3
Posts

1031 Exchange - Multiple title holders, one uses as primary

Dat Nguyen
Posted

We are three siblings, all listed on title for a home.  One sibling (single) lives in the home as a primary residence for the past 10+ years; the house has never been rented out.  The other two siblings have primary residences elsewhere.  We are selling the home, and looking for ways to reduce/defer capital gain tax.  We are considering:

1. The sibling who lives in the home will take the Section 121 exclusion to shield $250K of the gains from tax.

2. The rest of the gains will be distributed to the other two siblings, and they'll do a 1031 exchange to defer the tax on these gains.

Is this a legit way to split up the proceeds from the sale of the home?  The home has never been rented out, but can it still be considered investment property for the non-residing siblings?  I've read elsewhere about having to first convert a primary into a rental to take advantage of 1031 exchange; but in this case, that's not necessary since the home is already considered investment property for the non-residing siblings.  Is that interpretation correct?

Loading replies...