Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime

Let's keep in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter for timely insights and actionable tips on your real estate journey.

By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions
Followed Discussions Followed Categories Followed People Followed Locations
Starting Out
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 4 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

6
Posts
8
Votes
Stephen Lewellis
8
Votes |
6
Posts

Tax Benefits episode -- no mention of REPS

Stephen Lewellis
Posted

I'm a huge fan of the Rookie pod. Bravo to Ashley and Tony for keeping that train moving with content that's consistently helpful and entertaining. Thanks to you both and all of your guests!

I'd love to hear some thoughts from the group on one aspect of the recent tax benefits episode released 12/14/21.

Given that the vast majority of my family's income is attached to a W2, I love learning about the tax benefits of RE investing. In this episode, Ana touts the use of depreciation and cost segregation (presumably for unleashing bonus depreciation) as a way to offset active W2 income, but she makes it sound like it's available to every investor by default. Was anyone else taken aback that there was no mention of the Real Estate Professional Status (REPS) requirement?

For rookies, especially, I found this misleading. With respect to long term rentals, it's my understanding that one (or their spouse if filing jointly) must qualify for REPS in order to use passive RE losses to offset active W2 income. Qualifying for REPS isn't trivial, especially if your W2 is a full time job. I know the situation is different with respect to short term rentals, but it at least seemed like she was talking about RE investing in general, not just STR.

Am I on the right track here? Always looking to learn and find my blind spots. Thanks to Ana for being a great resource to investors and sharing some insights and advice on the pod.

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

3,749
Posts
4,499
Votes
Natalie Kolodij
  • Tax Strategist| National Tax Educator| Accepting New Clients
4,499
Votes |
3,749
Posts
Natalie Kolodij
  • Tax Strategist| National Tax Educator| Accepting New Clients
ModeratorReplied

You're pretty spot on- People CONSTANTLY are mad when they buy REI for tax benefits only to find out there aren't any in the direct way for thier sitaution.

If your AGI is over $150k- you can't use those losses each they (they do accumualte and carry forward, but if your rental makes a $10k loss you can't just count on your income that year being $10k less) 

The exception is RE pro which is not obtainable for most couples who both work w2 jobs. Or with only one rental (even if all someone is doing is managing the properties- likely won't hit the 750 hours requirement) 

But yes people shouldn't buy rentals for tax benefits until discussing what THEIR tax benefits would be with a professional first . 

business profile image
Kolodij Tax & Consulting

Loading replies...