Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Starting Out
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 1 year ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

3
Posts
1
Votes
Sarah Maze
1
Votes |
3
Posts

Sell or Keep California House?

Sarah Maze
Posted

My husband and I have been wanting to get into REI for a little while now. We have been researching and reading a lot (analysis paralysis!) and really want to take that first step. We live in Washington state, but we will probably invest in a couple properties out of state.

My question right now, though, revolves around a house that we own in California. I'm currently renting it to a family member under the agreement that he moves out in time for us to sell it within the 5 year window so my husband and I will have lived in it as a primary residence for 2 of the last 5 years (we moved up to WA a year and a half ago). We want that $500k non-taxed equity!

However, the house is in a decently rentable area and I refinanced during the low rate days at a 2.615% rate. I could probably rent it for $750-$1000 per month over what the standard monthly costs are right now (not including vacancy, maintenance, management company, etc). I haven't really run the numbers because until now I've never considered keeping it as a real rental. And my husband and I have both had *horrible* landlord experiences in California in the past, and we just don't want to deal with California's renting atmosphere. But the house is only 10 years old, it's huge, it's in a decent area that's still being developed (Eastern East SF Bay Area), and it has the potential to earn us some money.

Does the earning potential of the house make up for the headaches of renting in CA and having to pay a boatload of taxes on the equity when we eventually do sell? If we instead sell in the 5 year window, we could take that equity and put it into rentals not in CA and other investments. I just don't know enough to figure out what the right answer is and would really appreciate some insight and advice.

Thanks!

Sarah

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

362
Posts
109
Votes
Jacopo Iasiello
  • Investor
  • Miami Beach, FL
109
Votes |
362
Posts
Jacopo Iasiello
  • Investor
  • Miami Beach, FL
Replied

Hi Sara, Ultimately, the decision to keep the property as a rental or sell it within the 5-year window will depend on a combination of financial, market, tax, and personal factors. Take the time to thoroughly evaluate these factors and consider seeking advice from real estate professionals and financial experts to make the best decision for your situation.

Loading replies...