Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime

Let's keep in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter for timely insights and actionable tips on your real estate journey.

By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions
Followed Discussions Followed Categories Followed People Followed Locations
Starting Out
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 5 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

233
Posts
135
Votes
Adam A.
  • Investor
  • Toledo, OH
135
Votes |
233
Posts

Solo 401K vs. ROBS

Adam A.
  • Investor
  • Toledo, OH
Posted

Greetings,

After browsing and reading BP I still don't a clear idea which route to go.  In my situation, my wife will be a retired teacher by June 1ST @ 52. She has 403b and 401a plans which she can rollover from VALIC and STRS. 

We would like to rehab RE to rent and/or flip whatever the property and the market dictates. At the same time GENERATE income.  We would like to use part of the money for RE investment while the rest rolled over in mutual funds.     

My understanding and partial summation of the pros and cons and please CORRECT me if I'm WORNG:

  • Solo 401 cheaper to set up ($500-$800) and maintain ($100-$200 annually) vs. 4K -5K and 1K+. 
  • Solo distributions under 59 1/2 years subject to 10% penalty + income tax.  ROBS salary distributions/salary are tax deductible.
  • ROBS not a good idea to rehab and rent since it generates a passive income which is an additional 20% tax. Solo is good to hold and shelter up to 59K/ year.

While trying to sort out everything to figure the better direction, does the Solo 10% penalty + income tax outweigh the headache of ROBS, Corp C, taxation, annual testing and maintenance?

I've been an entrepreneur since college without having any full time employees and don't anticipate on starting now.  However, RE is new to me and I'm glad I found BP.

Thanks in advance.     

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

2,879
Posts
2,540
Votes
Brian Eastman
  • Self Directed IRA & 401k Advisor
  • Wenatchee, WA
2,540
Votes |
2,879
Posts
Brian Eastman
  • Self Directed IRA & 401k Advisor
  • Wenatchee, WA
Replied

@Adam A.

Your assumptions seem to be mostly correct.  Unfortunately, the tax code does not provide a middle ground where you can have tax sheltered passive income AND benefit personally with current income.

The ROBS plan is not well suited to passive holdings, though if you have a portion of the overall C Corp holdings in passive assets that is OK.  This is really a program for creating an operating business.  In real estate terms that would be an active real estate development and/or construction company.

If you have enough capital, or can start with flips and really get things rolling, the profit sharing plan at the back end of the ROBS structure can be used to hold shares of the operating business and separately hold passive, tax sheltered real estate rentals, as opposed to holding passive income properties via the C corp.  

Loading replies...