Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime

Let's keep in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter for timely insights and actionable tips on your real estate journey.

By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions
Followed Discussions Followed Categories Followed People Followed Locations
Starting Out
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 6 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

2
Posts
0
Votes
Conor Goddard
0
Votes |
2
Posts

Why is there a 2% rule ? Why isn't rental investment the easiest?

Conor Goddard
Posted

Hi All!

I probably have the most newbie question ever, but can anyone explain to me why there's a "2% rule" and why getting a loan and then having a tenant pay it off isn't the easiest way to gain an asset?  What am I missing? Is it that the expenses add up (property tax, mortgage insurance, repairs, etc) and you end up losing too much money? 

It just seems too easy to put $30k down, get a loan for another $150k, buy a house, rent it out for whatever the mortgage is...Even if you end up losing $200 a month, you end up with full ownership of a house in 15 years. Is it too hard to get a loan for that? Please help because I'm obviously not seeing it all. Thanks!

Loading replies...