Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Starting Out
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 5 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

1
Posts
0
Votes

FHA or Conventional?

Posted

I am purchasing my first home, and plan to use it as a rental property. I'm getting a killer deal on the price of the home. Upon talking with my loan agent, I discovered that I have a tough choice to make. Do I live in the property for a year, per FHA requirements, and then make it a rental; or do I get the convential loan with a higher interest rate, and down payment, so that I can start renting it immediately?

Im wondering what are some compromises I can make when it comes to this situation. Can I do the FHA and have tenants if I'm living in the property? If that's not an option, can I have "room mates"? Or is it better to just take it as an investment property, get the lease agreements rolling, and start learning to landlord? (thanks biggerpockets for making that a little easier)

Loading replies...