Skip to content

Let's keep in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter for timely insights and actionable tips on your real estate journey.

By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions
Followed Discussions Followed Categories Followed People Followed Locations
Contractors
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

User Stats

12,837
Posts
15,142
Votes
Bruce Woodruff
#1 Contractors Contributor
  • Contractor/Investor/Consultant
  • San Diego / Phoenix
15,142
Votes |
12,837
Posts

Old wood (houses) are better (From FB)

Bruce Woodruff
#1 Contractors Contributor
  • Contractor/Investor/Consultant
  • San Diego / Phoenix
Posted

Home Buyer: I want a house built after 1980.

Me: Actually, you don't. Let me explain. Newer isn't always better, and this picture sums it up pretty well. 

The quality of modern lumber is simply far inferior to the quality of lumber they were using to build homes in the early and mid-20th century. Wood quality began dropping on a serious scale in the 1980s due to old-growth timber being almost completely depleted.Most wood used today is grown very fast - not only can you visibly see the difference in quality, but the newer lumber is more prone to rotting due to a lack of heartwood. Slow growth wood yields much more heartwood, which is the longest lasting part of the tree, whereas sap wood (new growth wood) will rot very quickly. Modern lumber is also a lot more prone to termite damage as it is softer and easier to consume whereas old lumber is extremely resinous and naturally termite resistant. A good rule - as long as the plumbing and electric has been updated, a well-built home from the mid-20th century is a better investment and will likely outlast a newer build.

Credit to the respective author

Loading replies...