Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime

Let's keep in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter for timely insights and actionable tips on your real estate journey.

By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 2 months ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

17
Posts
14
Votes
Alberto Cioni
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Los Angeles
14
Votes |
17
Posts

Commission for the seller agent - new supreme court rule

Alberto Cioni
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Los Angeles
Posted

Hello

I am in the process to sell my investment rental house in Los Angeles. Now the rules have changed. I think and I am not require to pay a 3% commission to the buyer agent. 

I read that I should negotiate only the commission for our sale agent, our trustable real estate agent. For example I contacted Redfin and they are asking only for a 1.5% commission as a sale agent. 

Then the buyer agent with deal with the buyer for his commission.

Is this is correct? What is your experience?

Alberto, Landlord, Los Angeles

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

17,615
Posts
30,458
Votes
Russell Brazil
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Washington, D.C.
30,458
Votes |
17,615
Posts
Russell Brazil
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Washington, D.C.
ModeratorReplied
Quote from @Ned Carey:

@Russell Brazil do you want to answer this one?


 Sure.

This has nothing to do with the Supreme Court off the bat.

This is in regards to a class action settlement. Previously a seller or listing agent offered out a set buyers agent commission in the MLS. They can no longer use the MLS to do so. That is it, thats the change.

How people handle this varies however. Some sellers may offer out a set amount and advertise it off the MLS. However that offer means nothing. When a buyer makes an offer on the house, their offer will typically ask for the amount they contracted with their agent for.

This system generally disadvantages sellers though as we have seen average commissions rising with the new system. But this is what the courts, lawyers and DOJ wanted.

business profile image
District Invest Group
5.0 stars
43 Reviews

Loading replies...