Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 8 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

739
Posts
372
Votes
Chris Purcell
  • Investor
  • Philadelphia, PA
372
Votes |
739
Posts

Why is a buyer only required to put up a deposit?

Chris Purcell
  • Investor
  • Philadelphia, PA
Posted

Yet the seller is not held accountable for their actions?

IMO both parties should be required to put up a deposit, and if either bails then the other party keeps the deposit as damages.

There is a ton of work that goes into securing a property as a buyer

Loading replies...