This is my first post on this site and I look forward to connecting with many of you!
I'm currently living in the San Diego area but am considering making a move up to San Francisco. Was curious if anyone on here had experience with purchasing rent controlled apartment buildings and doing an "owner move in?" I've noticed that there are 100% occupied buildings for sale. They are being marketed at sub 4% CAP rates due to the upside in rents if a tenant moves out. I was curious how lenders/appraisers would treat an owner buying for example a 6 unit apartment building, then moving in to one of the units and signing a lease with the holding entity (i.e an LLC) at market rate? Based on my math, just bringing the owner's unit up to market rate would considerably improve the NOI and thus the building's overall value. Furthermore, I could theoretically purchase a building with a hard money loan with say 25% down and then refinance with a more conventional term loan once the owner move in has seasoned, as the LTV and debt coverage would be more in line with conventional underwriting.
Please let me know if my thinking is off base or if lenders don't allow for this structure. Looking forward to the discussion!
@Geoffrey B. , First, this is stuff you should talk to a lawyer about for SF, and I'm not one. The rules are constantly changing as of late.
Based on my experience, banks will lend to you in SF based on actual rents, so vacating the unit won't be to your benefit when getting the loan. Signing any lease within 3 years of doing an OMI is not legal in SF, and reporting requirements have become even stricter recently, so you'd be opening yourself up to a lot more liability if you try skirting no-cause eviction regulations. Even buyouts need to be reported to the rent board prior to simply having the conversation with your tenants.
Now, if you can buy the building, move-in and wait the 3 years before renting and refinancing, then that would be feasible. Most of the time, the numbers don't work out too well. And if you decide to live in a 5+ units building here, you'll probably be sharing space with some grumpy neighbors who will make you miserable, considering they've probably been living for many years in a deferred-maintenance-ridden building, while regarding you suspiciously as the new owner who's thinking about kicking them out... From that standpoint, you'd be better off moving into a smaller building.
@Robert C. Thanks for your feedback. If you can't legally improve the cash flow as an owner by just moving in and paying market rent, then it wouldn't make sense to get into that deal.
Agree with @Robert C. - Not only that, but if you're planning to move out a tenant in SF, I would be cautious and ask the tenant how much they want to be forced to move out and get that in writing.
Also, be sure to check if the property you get has to be retrofitted / if it needs to be, as SF proper has recently been pushing / enforcing that multifamilies retrofit for safety purposes.
Free eBook from BiggerPockets!
Join BiggerPockets and get The Ultimate Beginner's Guide to Real Estate Investing for FREE - read by more than 100,000 people - AND get exclusive real estate investing tips, tricks and techniques delivered straight to your inbox twice weekly!
- Actionable advice for getting started,
- Discover the 10 Most Lucrative Real Estate Niches,
- Learn how to get started with or without money,
- Explore Real-Life Strategies for Building Wealth,
- And a LOT more.
Sign up below to download the eBook for FREE today!
We hate spam just as much as you
Join the Largest Real Estate Investing Community
Basic membership is free, forever.