Updated over 7 years ago on . Most recent reply

0% Down, Owner Occupied...Yes or No?
Will be moving soon to a (annoyingly) HOCL area for career and to be closer to family.
Based on career/projected income, was offered a 0% down, no PMI, owner-occupied option (Rate is ~4.8%) from a bank we have a relationship with. Extends well into the high 6 figure range.
No intention of maxing this out, still focused on investment portfolio growth.
We are looking at living “small” relative to the area, and our income. Budgeting 10%-12% of our gross household income towards mortgage (or rent...). We will be settling in this area long-term, potentially forever.
Our first world problem gives us the following options:
1. Rent. Invest elsewhere where the numbers make sense. Aim to buy “forever home” later on down the road, maybe at next correction.
2. Buy a turnkey condo/home now with the 0% down program to take advantage of owner occupied financing. Convert to rental or sell. Advantage: It’s just barely over what we’d pay for a rental. Disadvantage: If it becomes a rental it will not be cash-flowing, offsetting the no down payment. (Glass half full: I can and would take the down payment and invest elsewhere...)
3. Rent (short term). Buy something more beat up (read:older) with owner-occupied financing, rehab and force appreciation. (Easier said than done, but willing to go at it.)
Question boils down to:
Should we continue to take advantage of no/low-down owner occupied program everytime we move?
Or is cash flow so important that it negates any advantage of low-down programs in this type of hot market where house values are smoking rental market? They don’t seem to be catching up...
Most Popular Reply

If it were me it would depend on how well you know the area. If it is a completely new area it might be better to rent for a while and learn where you would want to live long term. If you already know the area well and plan to buy either sooner or later it might be a decent idea to take advantage of today's interest rates.