Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 14 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

2,655
Posts
3,039
Votes
Scott E.
  • Contractor
  • Scottsdale, AZ
3,039
Votes |
2,655
Posts

When looking for an invenstment property, do you consider location?

Scott E.
  • Contractor
  • Scottsdale, AZ
Posted

Ok, I know the thread title seems like a no brainer, but allow me to elaborate.

I am following REOs closely and trying to zone in on exactly where I would like to make a purchase for my first invenstment property. Naturally, all of the most affordable properties are popping up in what most would consider a "spotty" or "ghetto" neighborhood.

I know the old wisdom of "location, location, location" when it comes to real estate, but does this also apply when it comes to investments? The issue is that I simply cannot afford buying investment properties in the best areas of Phx. (i.e. Biltmore, Scottsdale, Fountain Hills, Ocotillo, Tempe etc) On top of them being out of my budget in those neighborhoods, the 50% rule seems much more difficult to apply to a $250k+ property, as opposed to a $30-$40k property. Plus, it's not like I will be living in said property anyway, so I don't have to deal with the day-to-day living in that particular area.

What are your guys thoughts and strategies on location when it comes to buying a buy-and-hold rental? Are "bad" areas ok, or would you avoid them? If the recomendation is to avoid them, then is Phx possibly not the best area to buy rentals?

Thanks!

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

1,906
Posts
1,396
Votes
Mitch Kronowit
  • SFR Investor
  • Orange County, CA
1,396
Votes |
1,906
Posts
Mitch Kronowit
  • SFR Investor
  • Orange County, CA
Replied
Originally posted by Scott Swink:
Plus, it's not like I will be living in said property anyway, so I don't have to deal with the day-to-day living in that particular area.

No, but you'll be dealing with the tenants, their family and friends, and the neighbors that live in that area. Some landlords have good luck buying in the "slums" and collecting their rents in cash while carrying a gun. Sorry, not my cup of tea.

Of course, the numbers "work" better in lower-class neighbor "hoods" because the housing prices are so low (they're low for a reason), but those areas will never appreciate in value (unless there's some government sponsored urban renewal of sorts) and, IMHO, you'll be working your a$$ off for the next 30 years trying to earn that $100/door.

But I guess somebody has to provide housing to the underworld, it just won't be me. I prefer rentals in middle working-class neighborhoods where the cash flow may not be so hot, but the appreciation in the long-run will dwarf whatever monthly scratch I'm receiving from the rent.

Loading replies...