Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime

Let's keep in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter for timely insights and actionable tips on your real estate journey.

By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions
Followed Discussions Followed Categories Followed People Followed Locations
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 7 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

3
Posts
2
Votes
Scott McDonald
  • Santa Cruz, CA
2
Votes |
3
Posts

REItipster or Land Geek? Is raw land viable?

Scott McDonald
  • Santa Cruz, CA
Posted

Hi All,

I'm totally new to the real estate investing space and and still researching which niche will be the best fit for my situation: pursuing FIRE, living in the Bay Area were house hacking is difficult and investing in out of state traditional properties seems like a tall order for my first deal.  I have a very steady job that leaves me with plenty of bandwidth to pursue side projects and have a decent savings to deploy. Recently heard several podcast with Seth Williams (REItipster) and Mark Podolsky (Land Geek), almost seems too good to be true: low barrier to entry, impressive returns, low hassle ect.  Hoping that folks could share their experience with these two courses and their experience in the raw land investing in general?   


Thanks

Loading replies...