Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 7 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

303
Posts
149
Votes
Mike Nelson
  • Investor
  • Oak Park, IL
149
Votes |
303
Posts

Asbestos, but limited to joint compound

Mike Nelson
  • Investor
  • Oak Park, IL
Posted

There is a multi-unit building on the market built in 1969.  The building has been tested for asbestos, and it was found to exist in the joint compound, not in the drywall itself.    My understanding is the asbestos particles could possibly be released if, say a nail was pounded into he wall to hang a picture, or someone cuts into the wall.  Does this present any kind of health hazard or potential legal problem?  Is the perception of this type of hazard worse than the reality?  Another question is, "was asbestos commonly used in construction during this time"?

Loading replies...