Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime

Let's keep in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter for timely insights and actionable tips on your real estate journey.

By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions
Followed Discussions Followed Categories Followed People Followed Locations
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 5 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

14
Posts
2
Votes
Danny Le
2
Votes |
14
Posts

Sell while high or keep for cash flow.

Danny Le
Posted

Hello everyone of the Bigger Pockets community. I wanted to pick your brains as I am a beginner to REI'ing. I currently own my primary home and have house hacked and am generating about $1900 a month from rent. Which is nothing wrong with that, its just as I was taking walks around the neighborhood I noticed other houses are selling around my block for less than compared to what I own and selling for a significant amount of $$$! Now with that said, do you think it is wise for me to sell my home and take about $300k, or should I keep because it is shelter for my family and it generates $1900 a month. I have considered taking $300k and buying another home else where but then again... where am I going to find another place for a reasonable price here in Southern California. Perhaps move out of state and take the difference and invest? But would much rather stay in Socal. I do have savings to start investing but the extra $300k will give me a massive head start. What are your thoughts? Please let me know! Thanks in advance as I appreciate your time!

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

14,891
Posts
11,588
Votes
Theresa Harris
#3 Creative Real Estate Financing Contributor
11,588
Votes |
14,891
Posts
Theresa Harris
#3 Creative Real Estate Financing Contributor
Replied

@Danny Le  If you are happy where you are and don't want to move out of the area, then keep the house. You are generating $1900 a month in rent ($22.8K/yr) and they are probably allowing you to live there for almost free.  Think 10 years down the road, you will have $228K PLUS you'd still have that equity in the home...yes the home may be worth more by then and rents will also increase, but you get the idea.  Once you get out of an expensive market and move to a less expensive area, it will be hard to get back into that market.

Could you buy another place in an area you want to live (and work) and still generate that amount of money?

  • Theresa Harris
  • Loading replies...