Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 3 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

433
Posts
743
Votes
Tucker Cummings
  • Investor
  • Raleigh, NC
743
Votes |
433
Posts

Buying An Entire Subdivision of 124 Homes

Tucker Cummings
  • Investor
  • Raleigh, NC
Posted

This has me conflicted.

https://www.wsj.com/articles/i...

The snippet I'm talking about is how Fundrise bought an entire subdivision of 124 new builds 20% over asking to then use as rentals. This isn't the first article I've seen like this. Other hedge funds like Blackrock, along with Offerpad and Zillow are buying up houses left and right. 

First off, let me say that I'm a huge fan of capitalism. I love real estate and owning rental property (up to 8 in two years!). I think we're all in control of our financial lives and we are all personally responsible for ourselves. But isn't there a point where things like this squeezing out the middle class? How does a young couple, even if they have great jobs, compete with hedge funds buying houses like this? Homeownership is one of the biggest wealth builders and indicators of future wealth. 

I'm conflicted because I'm using the path of buying, flipping, renting, selling, assigning homes to build wealth. But this just seems excessive. Seems like it's more damaging to the overall market than helping it. Which then brings in the matter of some kind of subjective measure of "how much is too much?" 

Feel like I'm rambling, not making sense, but thought this would be a good discussion on BP. 

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

2,894
Posts
2,336
Votes
Caroline Gerardo#3 Private Lending & Conventional Mortgage Advice Contributor
  • Lender
  • Laguna Niguel, CA
2,336
Votes |
2,894
Posts
Caroline Gerardo#3 Private Lending & Conventional Mortgage Advice Contributor
  • Lender
  • Laguna Niguel, CA
Replied

Larry Fink at Blackrock is smarter than any average bear. The models for their funds and analytical tools beat a pile of investors every day. This is America.  Zillow on the opposite side is suffering, Rich Barton cornered real estate marketing but the company is flapping around and made high priced purchases in concentrated markets, not sure they can get the stock price back up. Offerpad, well let's see how they do a month or so after the IPO. 

We need new construction in a massive wave of small affordable homes. The big builders (I worked for one in the past) are buying land like it's discount candy. What they have in the works to complete by 2023 does not even meet twenty percent of demand. 

The publicly traded big guns don't harm the luxury markets, they are grabbing what you consider the house that the middle class would purchase. 

Many inner cities were gentrified before Covid. Now upper middle class and richer buyers are moving to the country if they have a cell tower. This also is pushing prices in rural areas that had not seen appreciation in the past 30 years. 

With prices like we are in the Gold Rush, individuals need to uncover the deals that aren't cookie cutter easy, in up and coming markets, and or are more work. 

The one thing I am certain: CHANGE. It's coming. Unfortunately I don't have Blackrock's Aladdin or my own crystal ball to tell you where that vein of gold is to mine. 

Loading replies...