Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Commercial Real Estate Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 12 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

31
Posts
2
Votes
Vaishal Patel
  • Arkansas
2
Votes |
31
Posts

How can i show "Material participation" to claim passive losses?

Vaishal Patel
  • Arkansas
Posted

So i was researching about passive losses and i found out that i cant claim passive losses if i dont materially participate in the property or (if i am not a real estate professional). How can you show material participation if all the management work is done by the property management company?Also can you deduct property management fees from your taxes?

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

449
Posts
172
Votes
Harry M.
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Dallas, TX
172
Votes |
449
Posts
Harry M.
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Dallas, TX
Replied

Disclaimer - I'm not a tax expert. Below is my understanding of how it works, but please verify independently.

Vaishal, to build on what Xing said, it sounds like you are mixing up expenses and losses. Suppose a hypothetical investor earns $12,000 in a year from his property, but has expenses*** of $13,000. His expenses are 13,000, his loss is 1,000.
He can deduct expenses on the 12,000, but not the final 1000, which would result in a tax bill of $0. The reason he can't deduct the final thousand is because he has nothing to deduct against. He never earned that thousand, so he wouldn't otherwise pay taxes on it anyway, since he never had it in the first place.

Now, suppose that the hypothetical investor also has a day job at which he earns $80,000. Now he can deduct the 1,000 against that income. That is what is referred to as deducting a passive loss. This can be done up to a limit of $25,000 worth of passive losses. Anything above that cannot be deducted. Instead it is carried over and deducted against next years income instead.

As soon as a person has an income of $100,000, the ability to deduct the passive losses begins phasing out at a rate of $1 per $2 over the 100k threshold. So a person earning 120k would only be able to deduct 15k of passive losses, and the rest would have to be carried over to be deducted from the income of future years. By the time your income reaches 150k, the ability to deduct passive losses phases out completely. Now any passive losses must be carried over, and can only be deducted from future years passive income, not from employment income.

If a person is a real estate professional, the 25k cap and phase out don't apply. Showing material participation is one of the hurdles to meeting this designation - another is hours worked (can't remember the exact number, but it is significant), and that more hours are spent as a real estate professional than in any other endeavour.

***Note that expenses can include paper expenses such as depreciation. So in the example, the investor might still have some money in his pocket despite expenses exceeding his income. This is one of the reasons why real estate is considered an attractive vehicle for building wealth.

Loading replies...