Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime

Let's keep in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter for timely insights and actionable tips on your real estate journey.

By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions
Followed Discussions Followed Categories Followed People Followed Locations
Foreclosures
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 3 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

17
Posts
8
Votes
Robert Alexis
8
Votes |
17
Posts

Urgent, possible loophole to save my earnest money

Robert Alexis
Posted

I placed an offer on a bank owned foreclosure that was accepted 9 days ago and am currently under a fully executed contract. We discovered a leak in the roof that will significantly increase rehab cost, making my HM Loan monthly payment too high to proceed.

I found wording in the contract that may allow me to walk away from the deal while keeping my 25k earnest money, but my attorney isn’t confident.

The inspection contingency states the “purchaser may inspect OR secure an inspection report of the property 5 days from the seller acceptance date”. Then the purchaser has 10 days from the acceptance date or 3 days from receiving an inspection report (whichever happens sooner) to provide written notice of disapproved items, after which, seller may request a copy of inspection reports supporting the claim of disapproved items . Then seller can decide to repair, reduce purchase price, or terminate agreement.

My question is, if I have my lawyer submit a written notice tomorrow (on the 10 day deadline) claiming that I as the purchase inspected the property within the 5 day requirement from the acceptance date, can I then use an official inspection report that was provided on the 10th day as my supporting evidence, even though the “official” inspection took place after the 5 day deadline?

I’m otherwise at risk of losing 25k earnest deposit

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

278
Posts
136
Votes
William Sing
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Portland, OR
136
Votes |
278
Posts
William Sing
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Portland, OR
Replied

I'd probably lean more on the side of the lawyer. The timeline seems pretty clear. The only other potential out I could think of is if your state/contract has a financing contingency or maybe a seller property discloser contingency. The financing contingency would probably be the better option and if the roof has an issue the lender might not lend on it. From my knowledge, Appraisers will not actually appraise the property if it is not livable or the major systems (including the roof) are not working. I'm not an appraiser though so you'd have to double-check with them. The SPD contingency is likely to void since banks are usually able to waive those since they don't know. 

Given how banks operate, you may be able to slide this past them but you still have a chance of you losing the earnest money. 

Loading replies...