Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Foreclosures
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 11 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

1,457
Posts
464
Votes
Sam Leon
  • Investor
  • Fort Lauderdale, FL
464
Votes |
1,457
Posts

How do you define squatter?

Sam Leon
  • Investor
  • Fort Lauderdale, FL
Posted

or specifically, if an owner Alan rented a property to a tenant Bob, and the tenant sublet it to someone named Charlie.

Now Charlie lives there and the property is foreclosed.

Alan and Bob are no longer in the picture.

Charlie is not leaving, property is listed but bank can't show the property.

Listing agent said the property will probably go to auction.

Now why would the bank not evict Charlie or offer him cash for keys?

Is Charlie technically a squatter or no?

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

2,918
Posts
2,087
Votes
Dion DePaoli
  • Real Estate Broker
  • Northwest Indiana, IN
2,087
Votes |
2,918
Posts
Dion DePaoli
  • Real Estate Broker
  • Northwest Indiana, IN
Replied

A Squatter is a person who enters and seizes possession of the property illegally. No person gave it to them, they entered and upon entering, seized.

A Tenant is someone who is given possession of the property or implied to be given possession. Clearly, not all 'tenants' are given possession by someone who can legally grant possession. The key idea there is that it was not seized by entry and use.

Charlie is not a squatter. He gained possession through Bob, whether Bob had legal authority to grant such possession is of no consequence in that sense. The bank must abide by the Protecting Tenants at Foreclosure Act of 2009 so they may not be able to initiate an eviction just yet. In addition, they may not want the cost or burden of doing it and will leave it to a new buyer. Any new Buyer will have to follow the act as well.

Essentially, Charlie either has a formal lease agreement which must be recognized or Charlie is considered a month to month, if no lease can be produced. Charlie does have to pay rent and that rent can not be 'substantially' less than market rent. Eviction can not be initiated for 90 days post foreclosure for any reason. After that, fair game.

A squatter from time to time does fall under the protection of a tenant. The reason tends to be it can't be proven the squatter is not a tenant. For instance, if the bank failed to check the occupancy of the property during foreclosure and secure it and a squatter sneaks in, then the squatter maybe treated like a tenant. If the property was secure and the squatter broke in, they are squatting and trespassing, they are not protected and can be force-ably removed with no notice.

Squatters can also turn into tenants under the same idea as above. This can follow similar occupancy standards like a hotel, around 30 days or so, they are considered occupants not squatters and are afforded rights which require eviction.

  • Dion DePaoli
  • Loading replies...