Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Foreclosures
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 16 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

1
Posts
0
Votes
Lara Ghelerter
0
Votes |
1
Posts

1st time homebuyer and REO's

Lara Ghelerter
Posted

We had just been bidding on a REO and we had supposedly come to an agreement. We had signed an original purchase agreement, but the bank hadn't signed off yet. Then we received a 5 page addendum that nullified most of our contingencies. When we refused to sign our realtor told us that the bank's addendum was common and we shouldn't try and buy an REO because the addendum was standard and every bank would insist upon the same addendum. Is this true? Is it standard for a bank to limit your contingencies to where you don't really have enough time to do an inspection and title search. And to insist upon signing away the contingencies after you've come to what you thought was a fair deal?

Loading replies...