Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Foreclosures
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 14 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

14
Posts
0
Votes
Sunil Kumar
0
Votes |
14
Posts

$40k REO Condo - Originally 130k. Buy or Not Buy?

Sunil Kumar
Posted

In a predicament. foreclosed loft sold for 130k in 2004, now an REO. bank wants 80k.

Taxes: 260+/mo.
Dues: 230+/mo.
All in all fixed cost to own the unit: $622

Will rent for $800 easily. $178/mo cash flow or $2136/year.

I will make 5%+ on my money if I offered a 35k cash deal on it. Bank won't finance such a low amount. They want to offload.

What to do? Would you buy it all cash?

Would you finance it instead and settle for a lower monthly cash flow but have the tenant pay down your mortgage over time?

What's the best route?

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

15,749
Posts
10,947
Votes
Will Barnard
  • Developer
  • Santa Clarita, CA
10,947
Votes |
15,749
Posts
Will Barnard
  • Developer
  • Santa Clarita, CA
ModeratorReplied
No is correct. With the $400 left over, you still have to pay debt service. Even if you pay all cash, you still must decide if the cash on cash is worth the investment and the JOB (dont be fooled, being a landlord is a JOB!) Never, ever, ever use or base your numbers off of Zillow "Zestimates". The ONLY thing Zillow is good for is to find the actual sold figures (which are true comps) and perhaps the current listings to give you an idea of what your list competition is.

So far, you have received advice to move on from this investment from several posters, of which, several are very experienced, yet you appear to keep coming back to make this deal work. In history, that is a recipe for disaster.

Keep emotion out of the equation. Your hunger to invest should not overcome common and savvy investment protocols.

Condos can be tricky due to HOA's, and the fees involved create a higher operating expense than units without HOA's. They can be harder to sell, but on occasion, market dependant, can be what sells.
I would personally consider condos to be a more advanced strategy for those experienced in doing so with proven track records. Please don't make this your first investment.

One more thing, your statement that the unit sold for $130k in 2004 means nothing. The only thing that matters is what it is worth now and what your market is doing now. 2004 was a phenom year for RE appreciation and should be disregarded in analysis as it will likely not repeat anytime within the next two decades.

Loading replies...