Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Foreclosures
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 6 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

157
Posts
143
Votes
Mark Rogers
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Little Rock, AR
143
Votes |
157
Posts

U.S. Supreme Court case on nonjudicial foreclosures

Mark Rogers
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Little Rock, AR
Posted

In a March 20 opinion, the U.S. Supreme Court resolved conflicting decisions among federal courts of appeal, finding that a law firm engaged in only nonjudicial foreclosure proceedings is not a "debt collector" within the meaning of the Fair Debt Collections Practices Act. The Third & Fourth Circuits had found that the Act did apply, and the Ninth & Tenth Circuits had found that the Act did not. The suit arose when a debtor tried to invoke the Act to force the foreclosing law firm to cease collection efforts until it obtained verification of the debt and mailed the verification to the debtor. The U.S. Supreme Court found that the Act did not apply and that the law firm was within its rights to ignore the request and proceed with nonjudicial foreclosure. 

Obduskey v. McCarthy & Holthus, LLP

Loading replies...