Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Foreclosures
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 5 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

21
Posts
18
Votes
Fouad Hayek
18
Votes |
21
Posts

Simplifying the Foreclosure Process

Fouad Hayek
Posted

I was interested in a house that was foreclosed on in March of 2020 in Stark County, Ohio. It went to a Sheriff's sale and the Bank ended up buying the property at the starting bid which was 2/3 of the appraised value, $120,000. If this home was placed on the market, I do not think anyone would have paid that much for it. I do not even think that the bank was owed that amount from the homeowner. Why was the bank so interested in buying it back? I know for a fact that the bank will throw this back on the market, but after all costs and fees added to the price they paid at the sale, would it be worthwhile for the bank? 

Thank you!

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

1,932
Posts
870
Votes
Ron S.#3 Foreclosures Contributor
  • Paradise, CA
870
Votes |
1,932
Posts
Ron S.#3 Foreclosures Contributor
  • Paradise, CA
Replied
Originally posted by @Fouad Hayek:

I was interested in a house that was foreclosed on in March of 2020 in Stark County, Ohio. It went to a Sheriff's sale and the Bank ended up buying the property at the starting bid which was 2/3 of the appraised value, $120,000. If this home was placed on the market, I do not think anyone would have paid that much for it. I do not even think that the bank was owed that amount from the homeowner. Why was the bank so interested in buying it back? I know for a fact that the bank will throw this back on the market, but after all costs and fees added to the price they paid at the sale, would it be worthwhile for the bank? 

Thank you!

The foreclosure process is already simple. Part of the problem is, your view of the process is flawed.The bank didn't "buy" it back. The bank submitted a credit bid as the opening bid/starting bid. That means, they instructed the trustee to start the auction at a specific dollar amount. It's usually a formula if the value is not sufficient to cover the total debt. If no one bids, the property reverts back to the bank as REO. The bank cannot bid more than they are owed. The can start with less than they are owed. They can continue to bid up to what they are owed. Many banks start with less than they are owed so as to entice third party bidders. The bank would typically bid up to their total debt or, up to a point that their calculations show is sufficient for the bank to recover as much as they think they will recover without further risk of owning the property in REO. The bank is not interested in buying it back. The bank is required to throw it back on the market if it reverts back to them.

Loading replies...