Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime

Let's keep in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter for timely insights and actionable tips on your real estate journey.

By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions
Followed Discussions Followed Categories Followed People Followed Locations
Multi-Family and Apartment Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 1 year ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

1
Posts
0
Votes
Kenny Wang
0
Votes |
1
Posts

(3 unit + 2 ADUs) vs. (2 units + 2 ADUs)

Kenny Wang
Posted

Greetings!

Scenario A :  The project (in Orange County, CA) I am undertaking is a grand-fathered 3-unit property where I will renovate these units and add two ADUs to the lot. At the end of the day, it will have 3 separate buildings and 5 rental units. 

Scenario B : a ground-up development of two legal units plus two ADUs, all detached. This is the 2 units + 2 ADUs scenario.

I am worried Scenario A might push future financing option into commercial real estate only, which will limit my cashout refi options and the future buyer pool.

From a lending perspective, since a "Land Use Restriction" is required to be recorded on the Deed to limit rentals to be longer than 30 days, the property thus will not be considered a true "5 unit commercial property" and my worries in Scenario A will not come to pass, right?

I guess from an appraisal perspective it could be a different story...

Thanks for reading and please share your thoughts and comments! 

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

9,937
Posts
10,792
Votes
Chris Mason
  • Lender
  • California
10,792
Votes |
9,937
Posts
Chris Mason
  • Lender
  • California
ModeratorReplied
Quote from @Kenny Wang:

Greetings!

Scenario A :  The project (in Orange County, CA) I am undertaking is a grand-fathered 3-unit property where I will renovate these units and add two ADUs to the lot. At the end of the day, it will have 3 separate buildings and 5 rental units. 

Scenario B : a ground-up development of two legal units plus two ADUs, all detached. This is the 2 units + 2 ADUs scenario.

I am worried Scenario A might push future financing option into commercial real estate only, which will limit my cashout refi options and the future buyer pool.

From a lending perspective, since a "Land Use Restriction" is required to be recorded on the Deed to limit rentals to be longer than 30 days, the property thus will not be considered a true "5 unit commercial property" and my worries in Scenario A will not come to pass, right?

I guess from an appraisal perspective it could be a different story...

Thanks for reading and please share your thoughts and comments! 


Actually, BOTH scenarios push this into commercial:

https://guide.freddiemac.com/app/guide/section/5601.2

See:

(a) Ineligible property types

Mortgages secured by the following property types are not eligible for purchase by Freddie Mac:

    A 2- or 3-unit property with an ADU that does not comply with zoning and land use requirements (illegal zoning)
  • A 1-, 2- or 3-unit property with two or more ADUs
  • A 4-unit property with an ADU
  • Chris Mason
  • Loading replies...