Skip to content

Let's keep in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter for timely insights and actionable tips on your real estate journey.

By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions
BPCON2026 Orlando

October 2 - 4 Early Bird tickets are now ON SALE. Purchase your tickets today and save $100!

Get tickets
BPCON2026 Orlando

October 2 - 4 Early Bird tickets are now ON SALE. Purchase your tickets today and save $100!

Get tickets
Followed Discussions Followed Categories Followed People Followed Locations
Multi-Family and Apartment Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 11 years ago on .

User Stats

685
Posts
334
Votes
David Avetisyan
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Glendale, CA
334
Votes |
685
Posts

Question: 'As Is' Sale in SoCal

David Avetisyan
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Glendale, CA
Posted

My question is as follows:

On an 'As is' sale in SoCal, who is responsible for the Certificate of Occupancy?

I would like to believe, even if it's an 'As is' sale, the seller should be responsible for making sure that prior to transferring title the property is clear of issues? 

I know the city sends an employee who will complete the inspection. For arguendo, let's assume a clause was never inserted by either party regarding a COA, and the city requests for minor modifications, what could legally happen?

- Further negotiating between the seller and buyer, with a possible cancel in contract and return of EMD?

- Is the sale null and void because it was really no ones responsibility for the repairs, and although it was an 'as is' sale, with the city issues lingering, no true sale could occur?

- Buyer is left to perform regardless?

Thoughts?