Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime

Let's keep in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter for timely insights and actionable tips on your real estate journey.

By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions
Followed Discussions Followed Categories Followed People Followed Locations
Multi-Family and Apartment Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 10 years ago on .

User Stats

62
Posts
7
Votes
Seth C.
  • Investor
  • Monterey, CA
7
Votes |
62
Posts

Adapting the 70% Rule for Multi-Family

Seth C.
  • Investor
  • Monterey, CA
Posted

Since property value of MF is determined by NOI and CAP rates, there are three ways to affect property price: Revenue, Expenses, and CAP negotiations.

Specifically in the 20-100 unit space, if we define market as average rents, average expenses, and average CAP, my question is whether 70% below market is enough in MF, or if we really need a 60% Rule?

To break it down, What would be a) minimum below market rents/above market vacancies, b) above market expenses, and c) better than average CAP rates that you would consider to be bare minimums to consider a deal?