Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Multi-Family and Apartment Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 7 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

65
Posts
32
Votes
Jennifer Brown
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Fort Worth, TX
32
Votes |
65
Posts

Job Growth or Job Stagnation? Which Location is Better?

Jennifer Brown
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Fort Worth, TX
Posted

I watched a video recently on a guy whose strategy in choosing a multifamily investment location is to find slower job growth. His philosophy is if wages are stagnant, then there won't be any raised rents and therefore, there won't be any merchant builders adding new product to the area. Thus being one of the only good renting options. 

Now on the same token, I've also seen that in choosing a location, you should make sure there is job growth and population growth. 

So my question is what are the pros/cons of both methods? I'm not even sure the first option is a good strategy so I'm anxious to get people's opinions! 

Loading replies...